<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay it forward:  Wrap Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265</link>
	<description>Things I think I've thought about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:45:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: IntrusionOnline &#187; Anton Logging Tip of the Week #15: Fear and Loathing in Event 560 (and 562 and 567)</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265/comment-page-1#comment-4992</link>
		<dc:creator>IntrusionOnline &#187; Anton Logging Tip of the Week #15: Fear and Loathing in Event 560 (and 562 and 567)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265#comment-4992</guid>
		<description>[...] the new &#8220;tradition&#8221; of posting a security tip of the week (mentioned here, here ; SANS jumped in as well), I decided to follow along and join the initiative. One of the bloggers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the new &#8220;tradition&#8221; of posting a security tip of the week (mentioned here, here ; SANS jumped in as well), I decided to follow along and join the initiative. One of the bloggers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IntrusionOnline &#187; Anton Security Tip of the Day #14: More access_log Fun: What Are You Not GETting?</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265/comment-page-1#comment-4951</link>
		<dc:creator>IntrusionOnline &#187; Anton Security Tip of the Day #14: More access_log Fun: What Are You Not GETting?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265#comment-4951</guid>
		<description>[...] the tradition of posting a tip of the week (mentioned here, here ; SANS jumped in as well), I decided to follow along and join the initiative. One of the bloggers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the tradition of posting a tip of the week (mentioned here, here ; SANS jumped in as well), I decided to follow along and join the initiative. One of the bloggers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IntrusionOnline &#187; Anton Security Tip of the Day #13: Into the Darkness &#8230; or The Ominous World of Unix Binary Audit Logs</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265/comment-page-1#comment-4841</link>
		<dc:creator>IntrusionOnline &#187; Anton Security Tip of the Day #13: Into the Darkness &#8230; or The Ominous World of Unix Binary Audit Logs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265#comment-4841</guid>
		<description>[...] the new &#8220;tradition&#8221; of posting a security tip of the week (mentioned here, here ; SANS jumped in as well), I decided to follow along and join the initiative. One of the bloggers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the new &#8220;tradition&#8221; of posting a security tip of the week (mentioned here, here ; SANS jumped in as well), I decided to follow along and join the initiative. One of the bloggers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265/comment-page-1#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 13:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Ahhh yes, the famous &#039;trunk scene.&#039;

And I guess it is hard to take down a tank with a sniper rifle, but in the game, its the quickest.  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh yes, the famous &#8216;trunk scene.&#8217;</p>
<p>And I guess it is hard to take down a tank with a sniper rifle, but in the game, its the quickest.  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoer Hoff</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265/comment-page-1#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoer Hoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/265#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Firstly, that&#039;s a great analogy.  Secondly, for the Samuel Jackson quotation, you get the best use of my favorite phrase on a blog entry.

Lastly, UTM expensive and costly to maintain? We should talk about that, because I need to understand this generalization.

I have to respond with a Pulp Fiction quote of my own because sometimes you just need a missle silo...and the last time I looked, it&#039;s hard to take out a tank downrange with a sniper rifle ;) :

&quot;Jules: We should have shotguns for this kind of deal.
Vincent: How many up there?
Jules: Three or four.
Vincent: That&#039;s countin&#039; our guy?
Jules: Not sure.
Vincent: So that means there could be up to five guys up there?
Jules: It&#039;s possible.
Vincent: We should have f**kin&#039; shotguns.&quot;

Great post, Michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, that&#8217;s a great analogy.  Secondly, for the Samuel Jackson quotation, you get the best use of my favorite phrase on a blog entry.</p>
<p>Lastly, UTM expensive and costly to maintain? We should talk about that, because I need to understand this generalization.</p>
<p>I have to respond with a Pulp Fiction quote of my own because sometimes you just need a missle silo&#8230;and the last time I looked, it&#8217;s hard to take out a tank downrange with a sniper rifle <img src='http://mcwresearch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  :</p>
<p>&#8220;Jules: We should have shotguns for this kind of deal.<br />
Vincent: How many up there?<br />
Jules: Three or four.<br />
Vincent: That&#8217;s countin&#8217; our guy?<br />
Jules: Not sure.<br />
Vincent: So that means there could be up to five guys up there?<br />
Jules: It&#8217;s possible.<br />
Vincent: We should have f**kin&#8217; shotguns.&#8221;</p>
<p>Great post, Michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
