<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When their emails have to be pretty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcwresearch.com/archives/370/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/370</link>
	<description>Things I think I've thought about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: tssci security &#187; Finding a middle between HTML and plain text E-mail</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/370/comment-page-1#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>tssci security &#187; Finding a middle between HTML and plain text E-mail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/370#comment-420</guid>
		<description>[...] In response to Michael at mcwresearch and Michael (LV) at terminal23, I&#8217;m surprised there has been no middle-ground adoption that gives users ability to format text (colors, bold, italic, underline, bullets, etc), without the nastiness of HTML and without the plainness of plain text. It looks like enriched text (RFC 1896) was supposed to do this, but never seemed to catch on. I&#8217;ve been using the following for &#8220;formatting&#8221; in plain text, and it has gotten the point across OK so far: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In response to Michael at mcwresearch and Michael (LV) at terminal23, I&#8217;m surprised there has been no middle-ground adoption that gives users ability to format text (colors, bold, italic, underline, bullets, etc), without the nastiness of HTML and without the plainness of plain text. It looks like enriched text (RFC 1896) was supposed to do this, but never seemed to catch on. I&#8217;ve been using the following for &#8220;formatting&#8221; in plain text, and it has gotten the point across OK so far: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

