<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSA - Botnet Live</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410</link>
	<description>Things I think I've thought about</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The SpywareGuide Greynets Blog</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>The SpywareGuide Greynets Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-548</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RSA 2007: Botnet Live&lt;/strong&gt;

The dust has settled from RSA 2007, and it was standing room only as Wayne Porter and I explored the methods of shutting down Botnets by dealing with details outside of the Botnet itself - in other words, tackling the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RSA 2007: Botnet Live</strong></p>
<p>The dust has settled from RSA 2007, and it was standing room only as Wayne Porter and I explored the methods of shutting down Botnets by dealing with details outside of the Botnet itself - in other words, tackling the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up Bev.  I had only verified that the links go &lt;i&gt;somewhere&lt;/i&gt;.  I kept thinking the spelling looked funny though, lol.  (I'm sooo dependent on spell check, its not even funny)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up Bev.  I had only verified that the links go <i>somewhere</i>.  I kept thinking the spelling looked funny though, lol.  (I&#8217;m sooo dependent on spell check, its not even funny)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-541</guid>
		<description>One more URL typo to fix, this time its my fault 'cause I submitted the final presentation to RSA for Boyd &#38; Porter ... should be www.spywarewarrior.com 

It has been fixed on the RSA official version of the presentation available for download to conference participants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more URL typo to fix, this time its my fault &#8217;cause I submitted the final presentation to RSA for Boyd &amp; Porter &#8230; should be <a href="http://www.spywarewarrior.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spywarewarrior.com</a> </p>
<p>It has been fixed on the RSA official version of the presentation available for download to conference participants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Link fixed.  Thanks William.  

Interesting thought Loner, to use Botnets to crunch crypto.  Yet another reason to hate the bot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link fixed.  Thanks William.  </p>
<p>Interesting thought Loner, to use Botnets to crunch crypto.  Yet another reason to hate the bot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Yeah, me spamming your blog some more. I agree with you fully, botnets were the story last year and will remain so for years, I think. For all the talk and posturing about NAC and user identity and data theft, botnets are still the scariest threat out there, imo.

Eventually, if not already, that third phase could include leveraging the CPU power of that base in addition to the networking power, much like Folding or SETI do now with using spare cycles to perform scientific stuff. I wonder how long some encryption might last when put through the ringers of a botnet cracking party? Or perform a distributed brute force against open authentication systems on the network (what is that? an FTP server listening? brute it from 10,000 different sources!)

I wonder if, 10 years from now, corporate networks will leverage campus systems in much the same way? Need some crunching done on a big report?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, me spamming your blog some more. I agree with you fully, botnets were the story last year and will remain so for years, I think. For all the talk and posturing about NAC and user identity and data theft, botnets are still the scariest threat out there, imo.</p>
<p>Eventually, if not already, that third phase could include leveraging the CPU power of that base in addition to the networking power, much like Folding or SETI do now with using spare cycles to perform scientific stuff. I wonder how long some encryption might last when put through the ringers of a botnet cracking party? Or perform a distributed brute force against open authentication systems on the network (what is that? an FTP server listening? brute it from 10,000 different sources!)</p>
<p>I wonder if, 10 years from now, corporate networks will leverage campus systems in much the same way? Need some crunching done on a big report?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/410#comment-537</guid>
		<description>http://spywaregUide.com is the actual site. Typo is to be excused due to the RSA frenzy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://spywaregUide.com" rel="nofollow">http://spywaregUide.com</a> is the actual site. Typo is to be excused due to the RSA frenzy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
