<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pen testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438</link>
	<description>Things I think I've thought about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438/comment-page-1#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438#comment-669</guid>
		<description>The Pen Test subject is becoming a game of tag, sorta.  Its interesting to see ideas knock around from blog to blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pen Test subject is becoming a game of tag, sorta.  Its interesting to see ideas knock around from blog to blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory.Blog</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438/comment-page-1#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory.Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438#comment-668</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pen Testing A go go&lt;/strong&gt;

Lots of interesting chat on the reasons to Pen Test, or not from various blogs starting over here at techtarget then rapidly spreading out over the blogosphere (hate that word but it&#039;s the only one going) to Matasano mcwresearch, Security...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pen Testing A go go</strong></p>
<p>Lots of interesting chat on the reasons to Pen Test, or not from various blogs starting over here at techtarget then rapidly spreading out over the blogosphere (hate that word but it&#8217;s the only one going) to Matasano mcwresearch, Security&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around the Blogosphere and Back &#124; RiskAnalys.is</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438/comment-page-1#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Around the Blogosphere and Back &#124; RiskAnalys.is</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438#comment-667</guid>
		<description>[...] In response to Dave, Michael over at MCWresearch ads his $.02 in a very good defense for the traditional reasons for penetration testing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In response to Dave, Michael over at MCWresearch ads his $.02 in a very good defense for the traditional reasons for penetration testing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438/comment-page-1#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438#comment-665</guid>
		<description>My bad!  I&#039;m so used to seeing him post there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad!  I&#8217;m so used to seeing him post there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave G.</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438/comment-page-1#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/438#comment-663</guid>
		<description>Actually, the post was mine not Tom&#039;s.  And you are spot on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the post was mine not Tom&#8217;s.  And you are spot on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

