<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechEd; A must see BOF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcwresearch.com/archives/482/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/482</link>
	<description>Things I think I've thought about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret Fisher</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/482/comment-page-1#comment-4490</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/482#comment-4490</guid>
		<description>yea, it was a great session.  Thanks MCW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea, it was a great session.  Thanks MCW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/482/comment-page-1#comment-3915</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/482#comment-3915</guid>
		<description>Yeah, we&#039;re in the same boat, though we boarded a bit later.  

We have a couple of our offices starting to deploy virtual servers a little too rapidly for my taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, we&#8217;re in the same boat, though we boarded a bit later.  </p>
<p>We have a couple of our offices starting to deploy virtual servers a little too rapidly for my taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/482/comment-page-1#comment-3905</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/482#comment-3905</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be going, but that sounds like a nice discussion! I wasn&#039;t around in my current company when the move to VMWare commenced, but we certainly have continued down that path as physical server lifecycles come due. In fact, after this fiscal year, I think about 90% of our servers will be virtual. Our production web servers have been virtual for over a year now.

And yeah, it is tough to make sure we don&#039;t go hogwild in putting up servers and going over on utilization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be going, but that sounds like a nice discussion! I wasn&#8217;t around in my current company when the move to VMWare commenced, but we certainly have continued down that path as physical server lifecycles come due. In fact, after this fiscal year, I think about 90% of our servers will be virtual. Our production web servers have been virtual for over a year now.</p>
<p>And yeah, it is tough to make sure we don&#8217;t go hogwild in putting up servers and going over on utilization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

