<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting Bittorrent client</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623</link>
	<description>Things I think I've thought about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:45:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mcwresearch.com &#187; Electric Sheep and Bittorrent</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623/comment-page-1#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>mcwresearch.com &#187; Electric Sheep and Bittorrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>[...] this week I observed one of my laptops running World of Warcraft accessing a *.torrent file. Today, I found another one, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week I observed one of my laptops running World of Warcraft accessing a *.torrent file. Today, I found another one, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623/comment-page-1#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>Three years ago I half-jokingly suggested to one of our developers that he should look into a CVS-bittorrent marriage to address our highly-distributed, yet highly-collaborative environment.  Files wouldn&#039;t be centrally stored but we&#039;ll have a centrally-managed versioning system, which would address our problem just as you&#039;ve said; by reducing the traffic that hampers collaboration due to centrally located file servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three years ago I half-jokingly suggested to one of our developers that he should look into a CVS-bittorrent marriage to address our highly-distributed, yet highly-collaborative environment.  Files wouldn&#8217;t be centrally stored but we&#8217;ll have a centrally-managed versioning system, which would address our problem just as you&#8217;ve said; by reducing the traffic that hampers collaboration due to centrally located file servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt wismer</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623/comment-page-1#comment-4967</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt wismer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623#comment-4967</guid>
		<description>bittorrent is the new content delivery mechanism of choice... i&#039;ve even heard of a (i think) university using the protocol for distributing patches and images to clients... i imagine in the not so distant future it (or something arbitrarily similar) will begin to be used by companies like microsoft to distribute updates and other content that currently bogs down their pipes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bittorrent is the new content delivery mechanism of choice&#8230; i&#8217;ve even heard of a (i think) university using the protocol for distributing patches and images to clients&#8230; i imagine in the not so distant future it (or something arbitrarily similar) will begin to be used by companies like microsoft to distribute updates and other content that currently bogs down their pipes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623/comment-page-1#comment-4966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623#comment-4966</guid>
		<description>Well, unfortunately a vast majority of our laptop users are local administrators.  The theory is, when they are remote and IT needs to support them, if they can&#039;t remotely connect, they can walk the user through the actions.  

But I agree with you, WoW shouldn&#039;t necessarily be on a company laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, unfortunately a vast majority of our laptop users are local administrators.  The theory is, when they are remote and IT needs to support them, if they can&#8217;t remotely connect, they can walk the user through the actions.  </p>
<p>But I agree with you, WoW shouldn&#8217;t necessarily be on a company laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623/comment-page-1#comment-4965</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623#comment-4965</guid>
		<description>As far as i know, wow uses bittorrent to distribute new patches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as i know, wow uses bittorrent to distribute new patches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJD</title>
		<link>http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623/comment-page-1#comment-4964</link>
		<dc:creator>MJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcwresearch.com/archives/623#comment-4964</guid>
		<description>A better question would be why is World of Warcraft running on one of your work machines?

Anyway, with 10,000,000 players each needing a 100-200MB patch a couple times a year, whats a better way for distributing it?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better question would be why is World of Warcraft running on one of your work machines?</p>
<p>Anyway, with 10,000,000 players each needing a 100-200MB patch a couple times a year, whats a better way for distributing it?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

